🔗 Share this article

Established political parties are increasingly enabling the far right to set the public discourse, as per a recent research carried out in Germany.

Academics discovered that this trend has inadvertently benefited far-right groups by validating their viewpoints and spreading them to a broader audience.

Analysis Based on Over 20 Years of Media Coverage

The results, published in the academic journal on political studies, utilized an computerized content review of more than 520,000 news pieces from six German newspapers.

Berlin-based scholars noted that as the radical faction shifted from marginal topics in the 1990s era to central themes like assimilation and immigration, mainstream parties progressively adapted their messaging in reaction.

This adaptation amplified the dissemination of these concepts and signaled to the electorate that such stances were acceptable.

Implications for Democracy

"Public communication by established parties plays a central role in the electoral success of the radical right," stated a political sociologist involved in the study.

"This factor has been overlooked," she noted.

The impact was noticeable even when conventional groups were condemning the radical faction. "You're still giving them attention," the expert remarked. "The main point is that because we live in such a struggle for visibility, this attention is crucial."

Mainstreaming Effect Throughout the Continent

While the research was centered around Germany, this normalisation effect is probable to affect countries across Europe.

"You see this a lot in German and British news outlets," explained another researcher. "The far right says something and everyone begins discussing it for several days."

"Although you're opposing it, you're echoing it," he added.

Toughening of Public Rhetoric

At times, political figures have also toughened their discourse to align with that of the far right.

In a recently published discussion, a then German chancellor called for widespread expulsions and urged them to happen "more often and faster."

Similar examples can be found throughout Europe, as politicians from nations including the UK to France adopt the language of the radical right, particularly on migration.

This has created an feedback loop that would have been unthinkable a decade ago.

Central Problem: Who Sets the Agenda?

"{If you're a centrist political group and you are talking about cultural issues – immigration, assimilation – in a way that is dictated by the rhythm of the far right, that's the whole idea of narrative control," clarified a study author.

Some political parties have taken additional measures, attempting to emulate the strict platform of the radical right, despite research suggests that doing so leads voters to vote for the far right.

Gradual Influence and Voter Awareness

The extent of information gathered showed that the influence of radical groups had been progressive and had grown with the passage of time.

"Public perception doesn't change from one day to another," commented a researcher. "However, when you encounter this negative framing around migration frequently, and it is being disseminated not only by far-right parties but also, for example, by mainstream parties, then of course this storyline travels further."

Requirement for Mainstream Parties to Develop Their Own Narratives

The research emphasized the need for established parties to develop their own discourses, particularly on topics such as immigration and assimilation, rather than constantly following the radical right.

"It's like a dance," said one author. "If the conductor is radical and you're reacting to it, you lose the ability to choose which music should be playing."